Hi!
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 12:55 AM, Antoine Latter
All of this really feels like what STM is good at. It might help if you explained why TChans are not well suited to your task.
Because it has too much overhead (I haven't tested it for my particular application but it is based on comment for isEmptyChan). I understand that Chans are more lightweight and once isEmptyChan was deprecated I discovered that for my purposes (non-blocking read) I do not need isEmptyChan and that code can be written without problems isEmptyChan has (mostly because there is a subtle change in semantics). So sometimes you have a work to do and you just want to check if there is something new in Chan and if it is not continue with your work. If you are interested where I am using it you can check my library Etage: http://hackage.haskell.org/package/Etage where I have such function: slurpChan :: Chan a -> IO [a] slurpChan chan = slurpChan' [] where slurpChan' cs = do mc <- tryReadChan chan case mc of Nothing -> return cs Just c -> slurpChan' (c:cs) Mitar