-1 from me.
In particular reference to the comment below:
On 4 Nov 2015, at 14:16, Dominique Devriese
The fact that it may conflict with previous, less natural syntax choices (lens composition with . comes to mind) should not be counted against an opt-in extension.
Lens composition with (.) is not really a syntax choice - Lens composition with (.) is simply function composition with (.) which is a fairly deeply-set Haskell choice. I can see arguments against using (.) for function composition but I don’t think anyone would seriously consider changing that now: and Lens composition will always have the same syntax as function composition. It just so happens that Lens composition with (.) gives us the ability to write person^.job.title which is one of those nice coincidences which looks a bit like C-style object dereference. Jules