4 Nov
2014
4 Nov
'14
2:13 a.m.
On 2014-11-03 at 17:07:25 +0100, Carter Schonwald wrote:
Getting those two into base for 7.10 would be quite nice.
I think this will mostly impact folks who maintain numerical computing libraries, such as myself, and even then, I think this would be a change well worth having!
discussion period 1 week (because I'd like to get it OK'd with plenty of time before the merge window for 7.10 finally closes)
I'm +1 for the `Storable (Complex a)` instance; I am, however, +0.1 for `Storable (Ratio a)` (I'm not for it as it doesn't seem too useful (and hence used) for bounded types such as fixed-width integer, otoh I'm not totally against an instance it as it'd help avoid the temptation of orphan instances as pointed out in the discussion so far)