On 31 March 2014 05:06, Mark Lentczner
*Haddock* - is there any reason not to use the version built and distributed with GHC 7.8?
from the package perspective also, +1 for continuing to use the haddock in ghc. *shipped with GHC, but not registered in pkg-db, yet possible useful to
include in platform:*
- haskeline-0.7.1.2 - terminfo-0.4.0.0 - xhtml-3000.2.1 -- already in platform, but HP re-builds it... seems silly
I would like to see ghc shipping these libs registered. *hscolour* - never approved as part of platform, but we use it to generate
the haddock in both GHC and the Platform - shouldn't we just include it?
+1 I actually wish it could be included in ghc too, next to haddock.
aeson
dlist (needed by aeson, which version?)
Sounds good to me. I am all for more libraries in Platform. Jens