Hello all, The PVP https://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Package_versioning_policy seems to allow changing the A.B version numbers in a package even when no entities are removed/changed; the phrasing is (my emphasis): if only new bindings, types, classes, non-orphan instances or modules (but
see below) were added to the interface, then A.B *may* remain the same
However, it seems to require changing the C nonetheless: but the new C *must* be greater than the old C As an example, I (mistakenly) released generic-deriving-1.7.0 https://hackage.haskell.org/package/generic-deriving-1.7.0 after having added one function to it, bumping it from 1.6.3. If my interpretation of the PVP is correct, this change didn't follow the PVP only because I did not increase the C. Had I named it 1.7.4, it would have followed the PVP. (Oddly enough, 0.5.4 would have followed the PVP too!) I think this is a bit odd. Shouldn't we either: 1) Require that A.B remain the same when no entities are removed/changed, or 2) Only require the C to be greater if the A.B remained the same? Thanks, Pedro