12 Sep
2020
12 Sep
'20
10:22 a.m.
On Sat, 12 Sep 2020, at 2:44 PM, Bertram Felgenhauer via Libraries wrote:
In any case I think that any change to the library proposal process should cater to all three types of stakeholders (and possibly others I have failed to think of). In its current form, I believe
https://github.com/haskell-core/core-libraries-proposals
fails to do that for observers.
Could you explain why this fails? I watch the ghc-proposals GitHub project and get notified of all comments, so feel as an observer my needs are well catered for. Furthermore, having each proposal be a PR can let me see how a discussion is factored back in to the proposal, as comments become a diff. What do you feel a ML has that GitHub + watching does not have?