Hi, Am Montag, den 08.09.2014, 10:24 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
Given that nobody complained about the standard-non-conformance so far I think having a symmetric zip where the RULES are semantics-preserving is more useful than strictly following the report. But I could be convinced otherwise.
David, I think you can go ahead and prepare a patch. People can still speak up before (and even after) it is applied if they disagree.
nobody complained, so I’m going to apply David’s patch at https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/attachment/ticket/9495/foldr2.diff now. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim “nomeata” Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de • http://www.joachim-breitner.de/ Jabber: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de • GPG-Key: 0xF0FBF51F Debian Developer: nomeata@debian.org