Re: 2014 Applicative => Monad proposal

+1 AMP +1 MINIMAL +1 Pointed in base On 24.05.2013 03:39, John Lato wrote:

+1 for AMP (with or without DefaultSignatures) +1 for MINIMAL pragma

On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Dan Burton mailto:danburton.email@gmail.com> wrote:

I think that removing return from the Monad class and making it an alias of pure is the Right Thing to Do, but not yet. The proposal, as it stands, is very tasteful about how little it breaks. Let's keep `return = pure` on the back-burner for a while. _______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org mailto:Libraries@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries

_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries

-- Andreas Abel <>< Du bist der geliebte Mensch. Theoretical Computer Science, University of Munich Oettingenstr. 67, D-80538 Munich, GERMANY andreas.abel@ifi.lmu.de http://www2.tcs.ifi.lmu.de/~abel/