Is there a particular reason to still push MonadIO even though
MonadBase (from transformers-base) is a cleaner, more
general approach that also fits much more nicely with more powerful
abstractions like MonadBaseControl (from monad-control)?
I know it uses MultiParamTypeClasses but is there another, more
practical reason for not using MonadBase IO instead of MonadIO?
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 11:29 PM, Ryan Scott
It looks like GHC's internal MonadIO was replaced with the one from transformers in 2013 [1], so this is already fixed.
Also, +1 on the MonadIO to base suggestion, now that's there's some momentum behind that idea.
---------- [1] http://git.haskell.org/ghc.git/blobdiff/b13d546f9c454e6d2a15c20a3e10ec47328e... _______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries