16 Oct
2014
16 Oct
'14
7:46 a.m.
On 2014-10-16 at 08:20:55 +0200, Simon Hengel wrote: [...]
I propose to change the error messages for the non-report version to include index and list length, something that is functionally equivalent to:
While I'm very sympathetic to better error messages; doesn't the implementation you gave defer garbage-collecting the start of the list, by keeping the head of the list alive until either the desired index has been reached or end-of-list is detected? e.g. consider something (silly) like ([1..] !! 10000000) Cheers, hvr