Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 18.10.2017, 13:49 -0400 schrieb David Feuer:
I am convinced that we should add
ordNub :: Ord a => [a] -> [a] ordNubOn :: Ord b => (a -> b) -> [a] -> [b] intNub :: [Int] -> [Int] intNubOn :: (a -> Int) -> [a] -> [a]
can we shed the names a bit? I think the operation “nubbing” should be first, and the details (”…On”, “…By”, “…OrdOn”, “Ord”, “Int”) should be the second component. This would also have the advantage of listing all ”nub” variants together in an index. So: nubOrd :: Ord a => [a] -> [a] nubOrdOn :: Ord b => (a -> b) -> [a] -> [b] nubInt :: [Int] -> [Int] nubIntOn :: (a -> Int) -> [a] -> [a] This is consistent with, say “map” vs. “mapM” and other suffix-based naming in the libraries. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de http://www.joachim-breitner.de/