3 Jun
2003
3 Jun
'03
6:04 a.m.
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 01:25:10PM +0100, Ross Paterson wrote:
I'm not sure that the separate top-level name is justified.
I'm not so sure about that either, but the hierarchy document had one last time I looked.
At the moment, Edison has its own top-level name in the hierarchy. This was intended to be a temporary measure - ultimately we want a comprehensive library of data structures under Data, but there was a feeling at the time that Edison is not The Right Thing. For my money, I'd be happy with something simpler. Cheers, Simon