Two modules would indeed solve it, and I alluded to it in my original message. (I used the term "internal" module, but I see that it was confusing.) However, the whole point is that you want to avoid that. I'm not suggesting this has the biggest ROI; but I can see it would have a few use cases and would be an easy solution to an annoying problem as the original poster was arguing. (And Lennart says that'd be easy to implement, after quite a bit of bikeshedding on the precise syntax I suppose.) On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 11:43 PM Henning Thielemann < lemming@henning-thielemann.de> wrote:
On Thu, 21 Feb 2019, Lennart Augustsson wrote:
Right.
Then my suggestion of providing two modules would solve the problem, too. Right? _______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries