Re: Proposal: Make amap an IArray method

amap :: (IArray a e', IArray a e, Ix <../base-4.7.0.1/Data-Ix.html#t:Ix> i) => (e' -> e) -> a i e' -> a i e this looks like map. just with a class constraint. I dont buy that theres any ROI for putting it into the class at all. By the same arguement, map and fold in Vector should be part of the class. -1 On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 4:30 PM, David Feuer wrote:

I realized what I wrote about amap earlier was utterly boneheaded, because it has the wrong type for fmap. The only way to accomplish my goal is to make Data.Array.IArray.amap a method of the IArray class. This will allow IArray instances to offer optimized versions and things like amap/coerce rules. The current implementation of amap can become the default one.

_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries