26 Jun
2015
26 Jun
'15
12:22 p.m.
On Fri, 26 Jun 2015, Henning Thielemann wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jun 2015, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote:
What? =====
We (see From: & CC: headers) propose, plain and simple, to turn the currently defined type-synonym
type FilePath = String
into an abstract/opaque data type instead.
Has someone else tried the pathtype package? http://hackage.haskell.org/package/pathtype
Hm, your last point "Decisions assumed by this Proposal" seems to mean, that you want to leave out more specialised types from this proposal. That is, dir/file distinction might be defined on top of the new FilePath type.