
22 Aug
2010
22 Aug
'10
6:47 p.m.
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Ian Lynagh
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:23:52AM +0200, Johan Tibell wrote:
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Ian Lynagh
wrote: Well, if there's a GHC code performance bug then we should fix it, but I don't think we should use a workaround in the libraries that gives a function the wrong strictness.
The generated core has the strictness we want
In your example, yes, but if f ignores its first argument then it doesn't.
That's a good point. Do you have an alternate definition in mind that would work better? -- Johan