Re: proposal #2461: add Traversable generalizations?of?mapAccumL?and mapAccumR

Excerpts from Ross Paterson's message of Fri Aug 01 16:16:04 +0200 2008:

Quoting Nicolas Pouillard :

...

I've also understood "<**> = flip <*>" when reading the docs :(

Clearly the docs need improving. Does anyone have any comments on the proposal itself?

I'm for the mapAccum{L,R} proposal, and the Backward, Applicative instance. -- Nicolas Pouillard aka Ertai