Re: Proposal: give a field name to Data.Ord.Down

+1. I do prefer getDown as the field name, but anything is better than nothing. Sent from my iPhone

On May 4, 2019, at 9:49 PM, George Wilson wrote:

+1

...

On Sun., 5 May 2019, 06:21 chessai ., wrote: +1

...

On Thu, May 2, 2019, 10:56 PM Fumiaki Kinoshita wrote: It's awkward to write a lambda to unwrap this kind of wrappers. I propose

newtype Down a = Down { getDown :: a }

with the Show/Read instances as if they didn't have named fields.

The same goes for Control.Arrow.ArrowMonad, although I'm not sure about its usefulness... _______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries

---

Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries

---

Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries