26 Aug
2013
26 Aug
'13
3:37 p.m.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Dag Odenhall
Let's also make number literals monomorphic to Integer and provide an n :: Num a => Integer -> a!
I'm guessing this is sarcastic, but I just want to clarify what I understood Henning's proposal to be. He's not saying we should provide an `o` function in the standard library, but rather encourage users to define their own. This one liner would take the place of the current line that they devote right now to `OverloadedStrings` . However, the analogy is still apt since the exact same line of reasoning applies to overloaded numeric literals where we currently rely on defaulting to solve this problem.