Re: 'temporary' package

On 07.05.2014 14:49, Roman Cheplyaka wrote:

Having backup maintainers is the answer. http://ro-che.info/articles/2014-02-08-my-haskell-will.html

Yes! +1 hackage should require a backup maintainer for every library package upload.

...

On May 7, 2014 8:36 AM, "Roman Cheplyaka" wrote:

...

No. In my opinion, there's no good reason why a package should remain broken for more than a day, given that there are people who has found, reported, and fixed the issue. All the actual work is done, now someone just has to push a button.

* Oliver Charles [2014-05-07 13:29:40+0100]

...

Isn't a 4 day turn around on a pull request a little hasty?

- ocharles

On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Roman Cheplyaka wrote:

...

Hi Max,

are you still maintaining the 'temporary' package? There's a breakage waiting to be fixed (with a patch): https://github.com/batterseapower/temporary/pull/12

If I don't hear from you in two days, I'll request maintainership and/or fork the package.

Roman

_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries

_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries

_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries

-- Andreas Abel <>< Du bist der geliebte Mensch. Department of Computer Science and Engineering Chalmers and Gothenburg University, Sweden andreas.abel@gu.se http://www2.tcs.ifi.lmu.de/~abel/