Re: Who needs and wants parallelism-friendly core libs?

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Edward Kmett wrote:

If nobody has any objections, we can use that as a sort of staging ground for this sort of change before they filter up to the main repository.

I don't have a problem with you working on vector, but why wouldn't you just stage stuff on a branch in the main repo? If you do it in your own repo, that makes it effectively invisible to other people.