16 May
2013
16 May
'13
5:24 a.m.
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 11:00:11AM +0200, Thomas Schilling wrote:
I'd strongly prefer "byteSwap". We already have shiftR, shiftL insted of sh[a]r, shl; I see no reason to stick to assembly convention here. Also "bSwap" still wouldn't make it clear that it's _byte_ swap rather than _bit_ swap.
well, it does if you have x86 assembly knowledge :-) But in anycase i'm fine with byteSwap. -- Vincent