
andrew! this is a really good point. would the with# or touch# combinators
be needed to fix it (to force gc liveness?)? OR would we need to have the
foreign c call defined to have an -> IO result, then use unsafePerformIO
to "purefy it correctly"?
i think the best way to explain *why* the proposed definition runs into
trouble is to look at how we annotate delicate/complicated prims in primops
are annotated
https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/blob/4bb9a349b5d002463b9fc4e9a3b6dbf77e...
otoh, the last time i was playing with an ostensibly pure primop that had
really delicate effect ordering, the prefetch stuff in the NCG,
my conclusion was that it *needed* explicit state tokens to make sure it
didn't get reordered, and for this primop that pure version would need to
be via unsafeperformio i think
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 8:46 AM Andrew Martin
This is unsound:
x <- malloc ... memcpy ... copy a nul-terminated string into x let len = cstringLength x free x
Because GHC can float the let binding down to where it is used after free.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 21, 2021, at 7:45 PM, Zemyla
wrote: That doesn't sound right. I don't think it allocates any data on the heap which could cause reallocation and move an unpinned ByteArray#, which is the only way I can think it would be unsafe.
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021, 17:50 Andrew Martin
wrote: Both the unboxed variant and the wrapper are only sound on primitive string literals. You cannot use them on anything that was allocated at runtime, only on stuff baked into the rodata section. This is a pretty onerous restriction. What use case did you have in mind?
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 20, 2021, at 11:02 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
On Jan 21, 2021, at 1:39 AM, chessai
wrote: On Wed, Jan 20, 2021, 17:01 Viktor Dukhovni On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 09:54:30AM -0800, chessai wrote:
I've wanted the following before:
foreign import ccall unsafe "strlen" cstringLength# :: Addr# -> Int#
cstringLength :: CString -> Int cstringLength (Ptr s) = I# (cstringLength# s)
A natural place for this seems to be Foreign.C.String.
Why a new FFI call, rather than `cstringLength#` from ghc-prim: GHC.CString (as of GHC 9.0.1):
I forgot about that addition. In that case we would just need the
wrote: lifted wrapper
No worries, sure the lifted wrapper makes sense, and Foreign.C.String does look like a reasonable place in which to define, and from which to export it.
-- Viktor.
_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries