7 Nov
2014
7 Nov
'14
3:02 p.m.
I find it hard to believe that users who understand weak refs would have trouble understanding this class, but that's fine. If you think a bunch of monomorphic variants are better I don't want to argue the point. It's a definite need though, since otherwise users have to define these by hand, so +1. Could we also please add versions for the stm types? I've needed at least one of them in the past.