21 Jul
2012
21 Jul
'12
2:24 a.m.
+1. People often reinvent splitting utilities because adding dependency on a package for simple functions like these seems overkill. Hopefully, inclusion into HP will help it and make the overhead smaller. Regarding the API: I'm a bit concerned with presence of synonyms there (e.g. chunk = splitEvery, sepBy = splitOn etc.) IMO it makes it harder to learn the API (which is not small even without the synonyms), and especially to read other people's code if their preferences in naming differ from yours. -- Roman I. Cheplyaka :: http://ro-che.info/