3 Jun
2009
3 Jun
'09
3:27 a.m.
Malcolm Wallace wrote:
OK, I object to the proposed change. The time library is pretty core, and should continue to be buildable by compilers and interpreters other than GHC. This does not necessarily mean it must be strictly H'98 compliant, but that would be a good approximation of the common language.
Can I switch it to base 4.1, or will that also cause problems? -- Ashley