Thorkil Naur wrote:
Hello,
Indeed an interesting question. Although I am no licensing expert, I guess that the intention of the GPL is that if you copy the Haskell readline code which is under the GPL and modify it, then the result will also be under the GPL.
if the only copyright license granted for the Haskell-readline code is GPL (which sounds true), then it has to stay GPL. If BSD was also given as permission (it's always possible to give more permissions for the parts of something that you hold the copyright to), then, no worries, Haskell-editline can be BSD. In fact it sounds like (1) we believe the Haskell-readline code is just released under the GPL (2) we haven't even found concrete evidence that it was released with any Free license at all (although if it was released, it must be under a GPL-compatible license because it was made to link with GNU Readline, I think) The parts that cannot be written differently can be duplicated/copied anyway. I would say that attribution is a good thing (e.g. just "inspired by the Haskell-readline package" if you're making sure not to be a copyright-law "derivative work"). Finding the author would be good if we could though, because she/he/they would most likely give us BSD permissions (just guessing :-) ~Isaac