17 May
2013
17 May
'13
9:40 a.m.
On 05/17/2013 01:28 PM, Henning Thielemann wrote:
On Thu, 16 May 2013, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote:
Wouldn't it be more logical to add a new typeclass depending on the byte-notion such as e.g.
class Bits a => Bytes a where ...
which could then provide byte-operations such as little/big endian swaps?
I would prefer that way.
+1, this solution seems more reasonable to me too.