Re: Proposal: Adding Kleisli composition to Control.Monad

On 11/13/06, Taral wrote:

On 11/13/06, Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:

...

...

(>=>) :: (Monad m) => (a -> m b) -> (b -> m c) -> (a -> m c) (<=<) :: (Monad m) => (b -> m c) -> (a -> m b) -> (a -> m c)

Does anyone have an opinion about these guys? :)

I want them. See my timeout patch for a case where I wanted one of these and didn't have it (the catch filter expression).

Actually, my tests indicate that (>>>) and (<<<) can be used for any Monad. So are we defining these again? -- Taral "You can't prove anything." -- Gödel's Incompetence Theorem