Re: Monad of no `return` Proposal (MRP): Moving `return` out of `Monad`

On 24.09 23:43, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote:

Concluding AMP and MFP, We (David and I) proudly present you the final installment of the Monad trilogy:

-1 Would providing automated tooling for changes be possible? I think there would be much less resistance if there was working automatic tooling for the various changes and e.g. >95% of Hackage would build with each new GHC version. Currently code seems to be breaking with every major GHC release. In essence this drives up costs of maintaining software. One of the reasons I use Haskell less than I used to use for work stuff is the lack of stability and constant breakage that adds up. - Taru Karttunen