Hi all, Simon Marlow wrote:
It's a trivial change to make, it doesn't break anything, and it lets us support more existing projects without substantial reorganisation of their file structure. Sounds like a no-brainer to me.
I've never liked the close de-facto connection between the hierarchical module name space and and the actual source tree. In fact, at times, in the Yampa build system, I tried very hard to work around that connection (as Simon might recall, something involving allowing "." in file names as an alternative to subdirectories, I believe). The proposal seems like a step in the right direction. Go for it! /Henrik -- Henrik Nilsson School of Computer Science and Information Technology The University of Nottingham nhn@cs.nott.ac.uk This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment may still contain software viruses, which could damage your computer system: you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.