1 Sep
2016
1 Sep
'16
4:53 a.m.
infixl 1 I assume? (lens and some other libs agree on this fixity already.)
(also, +1) On 21/08/16 19:23, David Feuer wrote:
The <&> operator is rather popular:
(<&>) :: Functor f => f a -> (a -> b) -> f b (<&>) = flip fmap
Now that we have (&) in Data.Function, I think we should have (<&>) in Data.Functor.
_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries