On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 03:53:48PM +0200, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
If I remember correctly, DData was intended to be the next-generation standard set of collection modules. So, maybe, we should just name the modules Data.Map, Data.Seq, etc. I think, it was already said that this should probably be done. A problem is Data.Set but there may be a solution for this.
I think this may be controversial. In particular, there's already Data.Edison, which is competing, and some people feel strongly that a class-based approach to overloading should be at least supported. I think this might be a good case for having a 'selector' library. Put DData under Data.DData.*, and have Data.Set (e.g.) re-export Data.DData.Set (since that's the most complete implementation at the moment). Peace, Dylan