21 Sep
2017
21 Sep
'17
4:02 p.m.
On 21/09/17 17:42, Henning Thielemann wrote:
I thought that it would abort immediately, wouldn't it?
Yes, I did a bit of a simplification here; certainly an overflow would either create "corrupt"ed data in memory immediately or (better) abort immediately. I was thinking about the case where you deploy code and after it running for a while (e.g. tracking elapsed milliseconds over 50 days of uptime) something overflows and either corrupts or aborts.