20 Jul
2014
20 Jul
'14
12:07 a.m.
Am 20.07.2014 05:01, schrieb wren romano:
Yes, uncons is a view, but I see no benefit in naming the function after that fact— given that "uncons" is the standard/popular name, and that we don't typically name any other views "viewFoo".
As I said, I chose the name according to Data.Sequence: http://hackage.haskell.org/package/containers-0.5.5.1/docs/Data-Sequence.htm... There is also: http://hackage.haskell.org/package/containers-0.5.5.1/docs/Data-Map-Lazy.htm... http://hackage.haskell.org/package/containers-0.5.5.1/docs/Data-Set.html#v:m... But I am not bound to it.