Hi David,
What are the use cases for such a package?
I'd love to see some examples of problems that can be solved with
Lazifiable.
Chris
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019, 19:25 David Feuer
I've put together a small package for lazifying record types. There's a "classy" version in Data.Lazify and a Generic-only version in Data.Lazify.Generic. A few examples are below. I'd love to hear comments on what looks good and what should be changed before I make the first release. As usual, names are the hardest part. Note especially that the operator ($~) is defined in *both* Data.Lazify and Data.Lazify.Generic, and that no operator corresponds to genericLazify. Hrmm mumble.
lazify (1, 2) = (1, 2) lazify undefined = (_|_, _|_, _|_) lazify undefined = Sum (_|_, _|_, _|_)
genericLazify (1,2) = (1,2) genericLazify undefined = (_|_, _|_, _|_) genericLazify (Sum (MyCon x y)) = ... oops, MyType isn't an instance of Lazifiable
lazifyGeneric (1,2) = (1,2) lazifyGeneric undefined = (_|_, _|_, _|_) lazifyGeneric (Sum (MyCon x y)) = Sum (MyCon x y)
Thanks in advance, David _______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries