I also like this change, and a lot of people use RFC2119 formalization
even without direct reference I find. So I'm +1 on adopting it.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Bardur Arantsson
On 2014-04-10 13:52, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote:
Just a thought: Maybe the requirement levels stated in the PVP in terms of may/should/must could benefit from a bit more formalization in terms of something like RFC2119.
[RFC2119]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119
+1. (I think that the RFCs terms may actually have been the intended meaning, but it could definitely stand to be spelled out explicitly in either case.)
_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
-- Regards, Austin Seipp, Haskell Consultant Well-Typed LLP, http://www.well-typed.com/