Re: Upper bounds in PVP

It seems like this issue has clearly been the source of disagreement/misunderstanding, so +1 from me too. The harder question is precisely what changes should be made. On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Austin Seipp wrote:

I also like this change, and a lot of people use RFC2119 formalization even without direct reference I find. So I'm +1 on adopting it.

On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Bardur Arantsson wrote:

...

On 2014-04-10 13:52, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote:

...

Just a thought: Maybe the requirement levels stated in the PVP in terms of may/should/must could benefit from a bit more formalization in terms of something like RFC2119.

[RFC2119]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119

+1. (I think that the RFCs terms may actually have been the intended meaning, but it could definitely stand to be spelled out explicitly in either case.)

_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries

-- Regards,

Austin Seipp, Haskell Consultant Well-Typed LLP, http://www.well-typed.com/ _______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries