10 Jun
2005
10 Jun
'05
1:19 a.m.
Hello Keean, Thursday, June 09, 2005, 8:52:55 PM, you wrote: KS> (sometimes the best is the enemy of the good!) i think that best in this case will be splitting library to "low-level" and "high-level" parts, where low-level part implements functions like "miltipleMatrixByScalar", "miltipleMatrixByMatrix" and so on and high-level part implements matlab-like or strong-typed access to this functions via appropriate overloaded operators and so on. so in this case low-level==semantics and high-level==syntax moreover, low-level interface must be general enough to allow different implementations - haskell, template haskell, ffi->lipack -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:bulatz@HotPOP.com