Re: Generalizing replicateM?

(looking at the patch) Shouldn't we rename them to `filterA`, `replicateA` etc. and move to Control.Applicative module? (like `liftM` vs. `liftA`) 2015-07-07 12:58 GMT-04:00 Bart Massey :

+1 for the Farkas-Dyck patch. Someone should check the performance of the replacement filterM, though: those loops may have been there for a reason that is still valid.

On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 9:51 AM Edward Kmett wrote:

...

+1 from me.

-Edward

On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 3:56 AM, Fumiaki Kinoshita wrote:

...

I noticed that traceM is generalized to use Applicative. Then, how about replicateM/replicateM_?

I don't quite like confusing names, but is better than needlessly restrictive.

_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries

_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries

_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries