
9 Jun
2009
9 Jun
'09
12:59 a.m.
Thomas DuBuisson wrote:
I should probably do a refresh of Control-Event
<snip>
Control-Event uses absolute times (control-timeout uses relative) - this can be slower, but might be what you want and allows you to add events via STM actions (no IO after the fact). Control-Event also has a control-timeout compatability shim (Control.Event.TImeout). On the other hand, it still uses old-time and really should be ported to the 'time' package along with getting proper version bounds in the .cabal file.
Well, if you roll a new version of control-event, I'll try porting network-dns to control-event. Cheers, Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/