8 Jul
2010
8 Jul
'10
5:31 p.m.
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Duncan Coutts
The one we discussed more recently is similar to what you are proposing now. I think the difference was that in what I suggested, the middle component of the tuple went to the end of the text, i.e. it was a prefix of the last component.
Right. I don't suppose there's a huge difference between the two, though the simpler formulation has the added advantage of working "out of the box" with those doughty and reliable warhorses of introductory FP, fst and snd.