
3 Jun
2008
3 Jun
'08
10:24 a.m.
| > 3. the hackage package list ought to list successful and failed | > builds (simply a list of compiler versions, each one green | > or red, depending on success, with direct link to build/ | > failure log; this would fit into the one-line-per-package | > format) for each entry, and report them to package authors. Personally I think that the key innovation on Hackage would be a user feedback system, like the user reviews on Amazon. Users can: - give a mark out of 10 for a package - write a review (perhaps short): eg "a real struggle to build on Solaris" or "worked like a charm" The marks are averaged and displayed, so other users can pick ones with good reviews. Well-engineered packages would stand out. Simon