Re: Proposal: new signal-handling API

On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 5:55 AM, Simon Marlow wrote:

I've just submitted a proposal for a new signal-handling API, the ticket is here:

Thanks, Simon. I generally like the proposal, particularly the modular aspect of signal handling. I think that if Johan's request for a lower-level API were followed, that would also satisfy John's desire for more explicit control. I notice that there is no binding for sigwaitinfo/sigtimedwait. Is this deliberate?