All, For quite a while[1] now I've been wanting to change the name of my Dimensional library[2]. The library blurb is: "Dimensional is a library providing data types for performing arithmetic with physical quantities and units. Information about the physical dimensions of the quantities/units is embedded in their types and the validity of operations is verified by the type checker at compile time. The boxing and unboxing of numerical values as quantities is done by multiplication and division with units. The library is designed to, as far as is practical, enforce/encourage best practices of unit usage." There are two primary reasons I have been wanting to change the name. Firstly I wanted to move the library from the arbitrary 'Buckwalter.Dimensional' namespace into the standard hierarchy. At Don's suggestion (patch) the library has been moved to the 'Numeric.Dimensional' namespace and if no-one objects it will remain under 'Numeric'. Secondly, I feel that "Dimensional" is to vague and ambiguous, in particular it could just as well refer to dimensions in the linear algebra sense as physical dimensions. I'd like a more specific and perhaps less pretentious name for the library. This is where I would appreciate some feedback as to what would be appropriate. Some suggestions are: - Numeric.Units - Numeric.PhysicalUnits - Numeric.PhysicalDimensions - Numeric.SI - Numeric.SIUnits - Numeric.Units.Static (While the library isn't limited to SI units or even the SI dimensions they are the main focus and default export.) Personally I like 'Numeric.Units' (it emphasizes that units are the key to interacting with the library) but I'd love to get a second, third and fourth opinion! Thanks, Bjorn Buckwalter [1] http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell/2006-December/018993.html [2] http://dimensional.googlecode.com