Can't we consider them separately? A new printf library is nice, and
so is moving printf out of base, but I don't see why one should hold
up the other.
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Joachim Breitner
Hi,
Am Montag, den 09.09.2013, 10:32 -0700 schrieb Bryan O'Sullivan:
Is this something we'd like to fix in the run-up to 7.8? Otherwise I bet a small coin in the currency of your choice that it will get forgotten :-)
if there is consensus (and it seems there is), and someone creates a printf library in time so that users have to change nothing but their package imports to get their Printf-using code running again, then I’d say: Let’s do this now.
Greetings, Joachim
-- Joachim “nomeata” Breitner mail@joachim-breitner.de • http://www.joachim-breitner.de/ Jabber: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de • GPG-Key: 0x4743206C Debian Developer: nomeata@debian.org
_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries