Hi
Yes, Eq, Ord, Show and Read.
I'm not sure it's possible to make it an instance of Data or Typeable is it? Doesn't that require a dependency on the generics package but System.Info is in the base package.
This is going to keep coming up, if we move the Data and Typeable classes out...
Is everyone ok with the type name? OSFlavour, OSKind, OSType ? We can't use OSName since it's not that specific.
OSFlavour - dislike, flavour pretty much means "it tastes like". Windows+Cygwin has flavours of both Windows and Unix. We want to say this is the OS you are using, its not just "a bit like" this one, but it really is, and it can only be one. OSType - seems fine. OSKind - again, has a slight "kind of like", and again Windows+Cygwin is kind of like multiple things. OSName - the name of your operating system - this is the one I would have picked. OS - nothing wrong with short names, especially when they are common abbreviations OperatingSystem - but no point optimising for character's when people are doing something we don't want them to be doing :-) I think in the end I'd pick OperatingSystem, as its very clear what it is. Thanks Neil