My old files processed with hscolour 1.13 had headers like
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd "> <html> <head> <!-- Generated by HsColour, http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/fp/darcs/hscolour/ --> <title>src/Imogen/Infon/Fol/Subst.lhs</title> <link type='text/css' rel='stylesheet' href='hscolour.css' /> </head> <body>
The files now don't have this header, and they are not showing up colored.
Ah, yes, that was one of the consequences of using -lit: it has always implied -partial. However, it is clearly a bug that there was no way to get an HTML / CSS / LaTeX prologue and epilogue in conjunction with the -lit option. Now fixed. The behaviour of -nopartial is now the default for all inputs, even literate files. People who want the old behaviour must now ask for it explicitly, using -lit -partial.
Second, I'm probably being a pain in the ass, but I'd also like to keep my literate comments preformatted. Right now they are mashed all together
I'm not sure what you mean. Could you send an example? (It is possible that it is a DOS/Windows line-ending bug.) I will make a new release 1.15 of HsColour once I have a fix for this second bug. Regards, Malcolm