Re: Getting comonad into base

Is this for instances of Comonad that you use, or so you can supply your own instances without a comonad dependency? I ask because I think I can recall a single time I actually had a use for comonad, and my understanding is that in Haskell comonads are relatively uninteresting - but it sounds like I'm mistaken! On Fri, 11 Sep 2020, at 7:54 PM, Sandy Maguire wrote:

Hi all, I frequently regret the lack of having the Comonad class in base. Are there any good reasons for its absence? If not, I can get started on a patch. Best, Sandy _______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries