I also defined this <.> for my own use, see https://hackage.haskell.org/package/Agda-2.4.0/docs/Agda-Utils-Functor.html (<.>) relates to (.) as (<$>) relates to ($). I find myself in quite often in the need of my own "Functor" <.>, and at least 100 times more seldom I require the "filepath" <.>. Do we juggle around filepathes all the time when we program Haskell!? Don't we rather combine functions a lot? So, a conflict with filepath is not the final word. Cheers, Andreas On 20.09.2015 12:03, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 19.09.2015, 21:30 -0400 schrieb Ömer Sinan Ağacan:
One problem with this is that the name is used by widely used `filepath` library.
I would say that this kills this proposal right away...
Greetings, Joachim
_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
-- Andreas Abel <>< Du bist der geliebte Mensch. Department of Computer Science and Engineering Chalmers and Gothenburg University, Sweden andreas.abel@gu.se http://www2.tcs.ifi.lmu.de/~abel/